Home arrow Media arrow Press Releases arrow Missile Defence arrow NATO set to back US Missile Defence - MPs demand a say - Public opposes plans
NATO set to back US Missile Defence - MPs demand a say - Public opposes plans PDF Print E-mail

The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament today released a statement from 35 MPs calling on Gordon Brown not to sign up to US Missile Defence plans at the NATO Summit in Bucharest. They demand that Parliament should be consulted first, as had been promised by Tony Blair. A new poll also shows many more Britons oppose than support US plans to put missiles and a radar station in central Europe, a highly controversial move which threatens to kick-start a new nuclear arms race in Europe.

The cross-party group of MPs state that they “regret that the Defence Secretary announced last July that the US would be allowed to use RAF Menwith Hill as part of the system, without the matter being put to the House of Commons. This was in spite of the fact that Prime Minister Blair had stated in February of last year that there would be such a discussion. We therefore believe that the government should not reach any new agreement at this week’s NATO summit, on the role of the system in Europe, without prior consultation with Parliament.” [full text and signatory list in note 3]

The system, which will see missiles installed in Poland and a new radar in the Czech Republic also makes use of two bases in the UK – the joint US/UK radar at RAF Fylingdales, North Yorkshire, and the huge US-run listening station at RAF Menwith Hill, near Harrogate, which will be used to transmit satellite information vital to the system. The use of the latter was announced in a written statement the day before the summer parliamentary recess last year, with no consultation, debate or vote. For more details of the bases, see www.cnduk.org/missiledefence

The new opinion poll, conducted across Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the US, shows net opposition in all the European countries, with an average of 20% more people opposing than supporting the plans (57% opposition, 25% support). In the UK 44% oppose the scheme whilst only 30% support it. Full results in note 4.

Kate Hudson, Chair of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, said, "This is a totally unnecessary system that risks fuelling a new nuclear arms race. It is disgraceful that is being foisted on Europe against the wishes of citizens in every country polled. To serve this system, our Government has allowed the base at Menwith Hill to be tied even further into US military structures without any parliamentary debate. Despite serious criticism from the Defence Select Committee and pressure from MPs across the House, Ministers haven't come up with anything remotely approaching an adequate justification for going along with yet another destabilising US project.”

She continued, “Missile Defence will protect no-one, but will put Britain, and others involved, on the frontine in future US wars. It gives the US the ability to strike without fear of retaliation, thus resulting in others, notably Russia, enhancing their own systems in response. This is exactly why new arms control measures are desperately needed, rather than plans which will once again increase the number of missiles sited across Europe - and see them targeted again on Western Europe."

ends

Notes to Editors:
  1. For further information and interviews please contact Ben Soffa, CND's Press Officer, on 0207 7002350 or 07968 420859
  2. The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) is one of Europe’s biggest single-issue peace campaigns, with over 35,000 members in the UK. CND campaigns for the abolition of all nuclear weapons everywhere. www.cnduk.org
  3.  “We note Defence Secretary Des Browne's recent statement that the US Missile Defence system will be discussed at the NATO summit in Bucharest this week. This is a matter of some importance, as we have observed, with concern, that the system is already causing political divisions in Europe.
    These developments merit serious discussion within Parliament, and we regret that the Defence Secretary announced last July that the US would be allowed to use RAF Menwith Hill as part of the system, without the matter being put to the House of Commons. This was in spite of the fact that Prime Minister Blair had stated in February of last year that there would be such a discussion.
    We therefore believe that the government should not reach any new agreement at this week’s NATO summit, on the role of the system in Europe, without prior consultation with Parliament.”
    Jeremy Corbyn MP
    Jon Trickett MP
    Jon Cruddas MP
    Chris Huhne MP
    Colin Challen MP
    Ian Gibson MP
    Martin Caton MP
    John McDonnell MP
    Paul Holmes MP
    John Leech MP
    David Howarth MP
    Jim Cousins MP
    Mike Weir MP
    David Chaytor MP
    Mike Hancock MP
    Frank Cook MP
    Nick Harvey MP
    Lynne Jones MP
    Linda Riordan MP
    Harry Cohen MP
    David Lepper MP
    Rudi Vis MP
    John Austin MP
    Doug Naysmith MP
    Roger Berry MP
    David Taylor MP
    Mike Wood MP
    Phil Willis MP
    John Battle MP
    Greg Mulholland MP
    Dennis Skinner MP
    Diane Abbott MP
    Joan Walley MP
    Glenda Jackson MP
    Jim Dobbin MP
  4. Poll conducted by Harris Interactive / France 24 / International Herald Tribune. Full results at http://www.iht.com/pdfs/europe/nato_synthese_uk_final3.pdf
How much do you support or oppose the plan by the United States to install an anti-missile defence system in Eastern Europe?

  French German British Italian Spanish American
Unwighted base 1122 1125 1109 1011 1054 1057
Support (net) 22 19 30 35 19 49
Completely support 6 5 8 14 7 19
Support more than oppose 16 14 22 21 12 30
Oppose (net) 58 71 44 49 61 25
Oppose more than support 28 29 26 24 22 17
Completely oppose 30 41 18 25 39 8
Note sure 20 11 26 16 20 26