purchase viagra online
Home arrow Media arrow Kate Hudson's Blog arrow Soviet funding? Rubbish

Kate Hudson's Blog

News and commentary from Kate Hudson, Chair of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament


Nov 26
2009

Soviet funding? Rubbish

Posted by hudsonk in Untagged 

What a rehash of tedious old rubbish from the 1980s.  It is a shame that politicians and journalists haven't got anything better to do than restate baseless allegations. If people want to attack Baroness Ashton, better by far to criticise something she has actually done, rather than make up a fantasy crime. No evidence has ever been produced to show that CND received Soviet funding; not surprising because there was no funding. CND has always been an independent, politically non-aligned campaign, funded by its members and supporters.

 Sadly, these attacks are nothing new, and CND - because it campaigns to change government policy on nuclear weapons - has had more than its fair share of harassment, including from government. This was particularly marked during the 1980s when CND was the chief  articulator of opposition to the siting of US cruise missiles in the UK. During 1981 this was more or less confined to encouraging the media to limit CND's access and coverage. But as public support for CND increased, the government increased its efforts, focusing on accusations of Soviet funding. Bruce Kent, who was then General Secretary, offered a prize of £100 to anyone who could produce evidence of Soviet funding, but the prize was unclaimed.

That didn't stop the wild accusations. Lord Chalfont claimed that the Soviet Union was funding the European peace movement to the tune of £100 million a year. 'If they were', said Bruce Kent, 'it was certainly not getting to our grotty little office in Finsbury Park.' From the beginning of 1983, Michael Heseltine was Tory Defence Secretary and established DS19, a team within the MoD, to organise the campaign against CND. Heseltine's main angle was that CND's aim was the advancement of communism, rather than bothering to engage with our arguments.

Attention also came from MI5, and when the whistleblower Cathy Massiter left the Service, we discovered that Harry Newton, a volunteer who used to stuff envelopes, was actually a government informer. A number of attacks came through an organisation called the Coalition for Peace through Security, which disrupted events, sent a spy into CND office and tried to link Bruce Kent with the IRA. The Coalition opted for slogans like 'Disarmament equals surrender', and was endorsed by leading Conservative politicians.

If people want to support nuclear weapons, it is better by far that they have an honest debate with us, in which they put forward the military and political case for keeping them. To attempt to discredit our arguments by attacking us on the basis of lies and baseless allegations is nothing but cowardice and dishonesty.

Comments (2)Add Comment
...
written by Claus-Erik Hamle, November 26, 2009
I made the following article together with former Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge:
According to former missile engineer Bob Aldridge-www.plrc.org-the Pentagon aims to achieve a disarming and unanswerable first-strike capability. Minuteman-3 and Trident-2 D5 linked to GPS obtain a CEP (Circular Error Probability -- the radius centered on the target in which half the warheads are expected to hit) of 30 meters or less, enough to destroy any hard target. And according to Bob Aldridge the US Navy can track and destroy all enemy submarines simultaneously. Please see Robert C. Aldridge: Nuclear Empire, ch. 9). Even if the Pentagon´s First-Strike Capability is only for blackmail, the Russians may have no choice but implementing Launch On Warning. Bob Aldridge resigned because a disarming and unanswerable first-strike capability is suicidal.
I hope you agree that the Pentagon´s First-Strike Capability is the most urgent problem because it inevitably leads to Launch On Warning.

Please help by mailing the above to everybody everywhere. Peace and All the best.
...
written by Claus-Erik Hamle, December 30, 2009
Uni of Colorado recently made a study on Nuclear Winter. Do you have details on that study ? Accdording to my information up to now, only 100 nuclear warheads would produce Nuclear Winter. IT´S NOT ACCEPTABLE. Why should we accept living under the threat of Nuclear Winter. Everybody can´t move to the Andes, Gomera, La Palma or El Hierro. But I would recommend Risaralda, near Anserma, in Caldas, in Colombia. It´s Colombia, old times, they don´t lock the door and many people offer a drink. Even the New York Times recommends the coffee region in Colombia to tourist. I´ve been there about 30 times. You won´t regret coming to Risaralda or Anserma, Caldas. The only problem is you may want to stay there forever. I urge you to read the books by former Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge and maybe get in touch with him-www.plrc.org. He resigned as Trident missile engineer because a disarming and unanswerable first-strike capability is suicidal. Come to Risaralda and Anserma, you won´t regret it!

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy

About Kate Hudson

Kate Hudson has been chair of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament since 2003. She is a leading anti-nuclear and anti-war campaigner nationally and internationally. She is also author of 'CND Now More than Ever: The Story of a Peace Movement'.